piatok 31. decembra 2010

Happy New Year to all my dear friends...

I wish you Health...
So you may enjoy each day in comfort.

I wish you the Love of friends and family...
And Peace within your heart.

I wish you the Beauty of nature...
That you may enjoy the work of God.

I wish you Wisdom to choose priorities...
For those things that really matter in life.

I wish you Generosity so you may share...
All good things that come to you.

I wish you Happiness and Joy...
And Blessings for the New Year.

I wish you the best of everything...
That you so well deserve.


Prajem Ti Zdravie ...
by vychutnať si mohol každý deň v pohodlí.

Prajem Ti Lásku  priateľom a rodiny ...
a mier vo svojom srdci.

Prajem Ti  Krásu prírody ...
by vychutnať si mohol Božské  dielo.

Želám Ti Múdrosť pri výbere priorít ...
tých veci, ktoré sú naozaj dôležité v živote.

Želám Ti Veľkorysosť, by zdieľať mohol si ...
všetke dobré veci, ktoré sa k tebe dostanú.

Prajem Ti Šťastie a radosť ...
a požehnanie pre tento Nový Rok.

Želám Ti zo všetkého to najlepšie ...
čo dobré si zaslúžiš.
ŠŤASTNÝ NOVÝ ROK 2012 priateľ môj !

streda 17. novembra 2010

Farming: Why Obama's government is George Wallace, Monsanto is the KKK, and we are all black children now


The US food supply is being taken over at this moment through regulations most people have never heard of or know about. Click here.

For years, environmentalists have been struggling to stop pesticides that are deadly to everything, and food safety people have been trying to stop GMOs that are threaten to human health and all of nature, and farming groups have been trying to stop regulations that make farming literally impossible. The arguments for organic farming and freedom to farm go beyond argument - it is patently obvious that is the only thing that makes any sense whatsoever.

So, why is industrial agriculture - which is depleting and contaminating our water supply, filling animals with drug after drug that make us sick, using such disgusting practices it has created Mad Cow and Bird Flu, wiping out fish stocks in the ocean with poisonous run-off into the Mississippi, causing suicides by the 10s of thousands in India and our own farmers deaths in huge numbers in the 80s here, destroying farming communities and the democratic base they provide this country, killing bees, and giving us diabetes and heart disease and cancers - pre-eminent over an agriculture that is simply and by all common-sense, good?


Look hard at that word. It is unfamiliar within the paradigm of agriculture but it is the unseen bedrock reality and it is the source of all the insanity mentioned above.

The poisoning of the earth, the mutating of nature, the dying of bees and farmers, do not derive from an even remotely just system but from one as systematic and malign as racism, and with same infiltration of government and extra-governmental use of terror to prevail.

Monsanto is currently in the process of wiping out hundreds of farmers in southern Illinois and destroying previously close communities through fear and paranoia. Within a frame of "agriculture" or defending "patents," it somehow passes as "normal" to have hired thugs trespassing, harassing, threatening, tracking, and abusing farmers and then pushing them into bankruptcy through lawsuits against patent infringement. Click here. Pulled from an agricultural frame, though, one can see that those patents as similar to laws that defined slaves as 3/5 of a man legally, because they, too, contravene all equal and natural rights of each individual to what is inherently theirs - in the first case, freedom and a vote, and in the second case, ownership of nature itself. And Monsanto is also acting as did the KKK, striking fear into communities on purpose, to cow farming communities and even to eliminate them in what it calls "rural cleansing." Click here.

A discriminatory group has intruded itself into a setting in which all people once had equal rights over nature, and it has managed to alter the entire system of rights which no one had noticed as "rights" before (access to nature being so unconsciously assumed). This immense overturning of justice did not happen accidentally but derived from extremely corrupt means - inserting a Monsanto employee, Clarence Thomas, onto the Supreme Court to make rulings that genetically altered organisms were no different from normal ones, and then on intellectual property law which allowed fro the take-over of nature through genetic engineering. People have recognized that this gave Monsanto a massive benefit - a lock on ownership of whatever it screwed with. But what has been missed is that those rulings by a black "Justice" destroyed previously taken for granted and thus undefined civil and human rights around nature.

The approach to pesticides has been similar. They have been seen merely as a product to be tested and approved or not approved, but something primary has been missing in that - a recognition that the corruption of the process is a civil rights issue. "Life," liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In those words, it becomes plain that health, and thus what is done to threaten nature, the source of all life, is a civil right. Lost within "agriculture" and "commodities" or "profit" or "studies" is the profound truth that this is about life or death and our civil rights to life. One group is using corrupt means to discriminate against a defined segment of the population - all of us who wish to live.

We are used to seeing discrimination personified - George Wallace in the school house door blocking little black children from getting an education, and Bull Connor setting fire hoses and dogs on peaceful black protesters. That template became the defining one for civil rights - white over blacks, good people being stopped by the government. But it does not fit civil rights abuses now.

Today, government is not the rescuer but itself is attacking a marginalized group and stands between it and something they need. This is even harder to recognize now that Obama is president - for he is a black man overseeing a government that is discriminating and abusing a marginalized group. Who is the marginalized group? It is hard to see as well because it is all of us. And what is that group being denied through discriminatory laws and practices (and armed raids)? What we all need to survive - nature in a healthy state and full freedoms to it. And who is being discriminated in favor of? Multinational corporations such as Monsanto.

It makes for a much harder to draw political cartoon because the discrimination is so total and the government, run by a black man, is part of it.

But let's look at only a couple of examples to see how it works precisely as discriminatory laws worked against the civil rights of blacks.

Voting rights were the heart of civil rights because they defined the equal personhood of black people. To block them from this civil right, poll taxes were interposed between them and the vote. They "were allowed" to vote, only the cost made it prohibitive.

Today, farmers are allowed to farm but the FDA's seed contamination regulations (with Monsanto's hand in them easy to see) have just listed seed cleaning equipment as sources of seed contamination and farmers are no longer allowed to use the equipment they have to clean seed to sell to the public now. Click here. The seeds included? Those eaten raw (flax, poppy, sesame); those sprouted (wheat, alfalfa, beans, greens, broccoli, etc.); those pressed into oils (corn, soy, sunflower, canola, etc.); those used for animal feed. Oh, farmers can still clean those seeds but they would have to get equipment the FDA now requires as safe enough - a million to a million and half dollar building and equipment ... for each line of seed. A farmer with hand made seed cleaning equipment he's used for 40 years to clean seeds which never made a single person sick, would now need to build 15 buildings if he wishes to raise and sell 15 kinds of seeds. This corporate influence is criminal and corrupt. But even putting that aside, the imposition of corporate standards on small farmers is discriminatory. And intentionally so. Just as with voting rights, it is meant to deny the civil rights of one group to the advantage of a more powerful one.

A second example. Once poll taxes were eliminated, racist white people found another means of blocking blacks from voting - literacy tests. Using the seemingly rational argument that people should be educated enough to vote, they inserted this bar between black people and their full Constitutional right to vote. Black people were slurred, deemed "too dumb to vote." No one, of course, was testing whether the racists were too undemocratic to vote, too cruel, too miseducated, too corrupt, or too ... whatever. And no one asked whether common sense and decency and a history of being treated unjustly were actually ideal qualifications for voting and literacy was irrelevant and not included in the Constitution. What mattered was only that one group discriminated against another and denied them their Constitutional rights and using "false measures of value" to do so.

Today, farmers have "the right" to farm but the government is attacking their products as "too dirty to sell." The USDA and its state agriculture departments are increasingly making raids against Mennonite and Amish raw milk dairy farmers and others who have been producing and selling their clean and healthy products for hundreds of years without complaint from customers. Click here. The government lab results which are used to close down farms don't match independent labs, and farmers fear the permits demanded of them set them up for attacks against them. Those behind the "food safety" attacks represent filthy food already making our population sick - food derived from disease-creating feed processes, from GMOs, from heavy pesticide use, from hormones, steroids and antibiotics. Just as the racists hid behind literacy as the criteria for democracy, but were at their core illiterate about democracy and anti-democratic, those discriminating against farmers ("farmists"?) hide behind "food safety" as a bar to selling food, but are at their core are "too profit-blinded to produce safe food" as well as profoundly anti-democratic. "Food filthy" is attacking those providing true food safety and the healthiest food in the country. These attacks are certainly criminal and corrupt and in Canada, a farmer is actually suing the government for criminal conspiracy. Click here. But what is important is to see through the criminality and corruption and the bogus use of "food safety" to the discrimination involved in generating a view of farmers as incapable of farming adequately - and by those farming dangerously. Just as with demanding literacy tests (which were also rigged), condemning farmers' food as unsafe it is a device meant to stop farmers from farming. And just as with voting rights, this is discrimination - an absolute denial of the civil rights of one group to the advantage of a more powerful one.

So, American farmers can farm, only their means have been removed and they are being being raided and their products seized and the public is told what they produce is dirty and dangerous. Many farmers refuse to get permits out of fear and out of their belief it is their Constitutional right to contract freely with neighbors without the interference of a corrupt government, one that is not only intentionally discriminatory but has become dangerous in its armed attacks against them. They want testing for pathogens but distrust the government labs now. And in California, "too dirty to sell" comes now in the form of a government law that intentionally sets the bar higher than normal fresh milk can meet. Click here. Farmers recognize the George Wallace/Bull Connor behind the demand for permits, and are standing up for their Constitutional rights against their own government, and using the language of Rosa Parks and the civil rights movement in doing so. Click here.

Monsanto triggers thoughts of the civil rights movement, because its KKK tactics work the same way, as does its infiltration of good ole boy networks within state and national governments. Vilsack pushing of anti-democratic laws that preempt a community's means to control what is planted in its area, his pushing for GMOs, his pushing of NAIS, his supporting CAFOs which wiped out thousands of small farmers in Iowa, should be seen only through the lens of his working for Monsanto or of the government being corrupted through his closeness to Monsanto. Instead, his actions should be seen as massively discriminatory against farmers and against citizens whose constitutional right to life, and to liberty through democratic laws, is being aggressively and endlessly and covertly and powerfully denied.

Pull farming and pesticides and GMOs out of the frame they have been held in. It's almost like pulling them out of the mud. Wash them off and hold them up and look at them again. Realize that you are the little black child now unable to reach a decent life. And in that doorway, towering over you and all of us, is our own government (infiltrated by Monsanto), blocking every one of us from farming, from having a country full of small farmers, from local food, from safe food, from clean unpoisoned land, from healthy bees and birds, from normal seeds and trees and animals, available to everyone, and from our democracy.

Instead, we have a government ramping up to create a disease scare (as bird flu is being used in Asia right now) and use Homeland Security to wipe out normal animals stocks and normal seeds at will, and replace them with genetically engineered and patented ones. "Food safety," "diseases," "bioterrorism" all part of how the Patriot Act and Bush's "war on terror" are justified as weapons against us and our civil rights.

This is not just an agricultural issue. It is a civil rights and a human rights issue - the most profound in human history since it is about the right to (normal) nature and survival itself. The totalitarian and corrupt parties discriminating against us all can only be dealt with once we see this as a single issue and come together in a civil rights movement on behalf of us all. -->

štvrtok 26. augusta 2010

The Lies Of Hiroshima Are The Lies Of Today - Lži o Hirošíme sú lži o dnešku

author:John Pilger

On the anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, John Pilger describes the 'progression of lies' from the dust of that detonated city, to the wars of today - and the threatened attack on Iran.

When I first went to Hiroshima in 1967, the shadow on the steps was still there. It was an almost perfect impression of a human being at ease: legs splayed, back bent, one hand by her side as she sat waiting for a bank to open. At a quarter past eight on the morning of August 6, 1945, she and her silhouette were burned into the granite. I stared at the shadow for an hour or more, then walked down to the river and met a man called Yukio, whose chest was still etched with the pattern of the shirt he was wearing when the atomic bomb was dropped.

He and his family still lived in a shack thrown up in the dust of an atomic desert. He described a huge flash over the city, "a bluish light, something like an electrical short", after which wind blew like a tornado and black rain fell. "I was thrown on the ground and noticed only the stalks of my flowers were left. Everything was still and quiet, and when I got up, there were people naked, not saying anything. Some of them had no skin or hair. I was certain I was dead." Nine years later, when I returned to look for him, he was dead from leukaemia.

In the immediate aftermath of the bomb, the allied occupation authorities banned all mention of radiation poisoning and insisted that people had been killed or injured only by the bomb's blast. It was the first big lie. "No radioactivity in Hiroshima ruin" said the front page of the New York Times, a classic of disinformation and journalistic abdication, which the Australian reporter Wilfred Burchett put right with his scoop of the century. "I write this as a warning to the world," reported Burchett in the Daily Express, having reached Hiroshima after a perilous journey, the first correspondent to dare. He described hospital wards filled with people with no visible injuries but who were dying from what he called "an atomic plague". For telling this truth, his press accreditation was withdrawn, he was pilloried and smeared - and vindicated.

The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a criminal act on an epic scale. It was premeditated mass murder that unleashed a weapon of intrinsic criminality. For this reason its apologists have sought refuge in the mythology of the ultimate "good war", whose "ethical bath", as Richard Drayton called it, has allowed the west not only to expiate its bloody imperial past but to promote 60 years of rapacious war, always beneath the shadow of The Bomb.

The most enduring lie is that the atomic bomb was dropped to end the war in the Pacific and save lives. "Even without the atomic bombing attacks," concluded the United States Strategic Bombing Survey of 1946, "air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about unconditional surrender and obviate the need for invasion. Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that ... Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated."

The National Archives in Washington contain US government documents that chart Japanese peace overtures as early as 1943. None was pursued. A cable sent on May 5, 1945 by the German ambassador in Tokyo and intercepted by the US dispels any doubt that the Japanese were desperate to sue for peace, including "capitulation even if the terms were hard". Instead, the US secretary of war, Henry Stimson, told President Truman he was "fearful" that the US air force would have Japan so "bombed out" that the new weapon would not be able "to show its strength". He later admitted that "no effort was made, and none was seriously considered, to achieve surrender merely in order not to have to use the bomb". His foreign policy colleagues were eager "to browbeat the Russians with the bomb held rather ostentatiously on our hip". General Leslie Groves, director of the Manhattan Project that made the bomb, testified: "There was never any illusion on my part that Russia was our enemy, and that the project was conducted on that basis." The day after Hiroshima was obliterated, President Truman voiced his satisfaction with the "overwhelming success" of "the experiment".

Since 1945, the United States is believed to have been on the brink of using nuclear weapons at least three times. In waging their bogus "war on terror", the present governments in Washington and London have declared they are prepared to make "pre-emptive" nuclear strikes against non-nuclear states. With each stroke toward the midnight of a nuclear Armageddon, the lies of justification grow more outrageous. Iran is the current "threat". But Iran has no nuclear weapons and the disinformation that it is planning a nuclear arsenal comes largely from a discredited CIA-sponsored Iranian opposition group, the MEK - just as the lies about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction originated with the Iraqi National Congress, set up by Washington.

The role of western journalism in erecting this straw man is critical. That America's Defence Intelligence Estimate says "with high confidence" that Iran gave up its nuclear weapons programme in 2003 has been consigned to the memory hole. That Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never threatened to "wipe Israel off the map" is of no interest. But such has been the mantra of this media "fact" that in his recent, obsequious performance before the Israeli parliament, Gordon Brown alluded to it as he threatened Iran, yet again.

This progression of lies has brought us to one of the most dangerous nuclear crises since 1945, because the real threat remains almost unmentionable in western establishment circles and therefore in the media. There is only one rampant nuclear power in the Middle East and that is Israel. The heroic Mordechai Vanunu tried to warn the world in 1986 when he smuggled out evidence that Israel was building as many as 200 nuclear warheads. In defiance of UN resolutions, Israel is today clearly itching to attack Iran, fearful that a new American administration might, just might, conduct genuine negotiations with a nation the west has defiled since Britain and America overthrew Iranian democracy in 1953.

In the New York Times on July 18, the Israeli historian Benny Morris, once considered a liberal and now a consultant to his country's political and military establishment, threatened "an Iran turned into a nuclear wasteland". This would be mass murder. For a Jew, the irony cries out.

The question begs: are the rest of us to be mere bystanders, claiming, as good Germans did, that "we did not know"? Do we hide ever more behind what Richard Falk has called "a self-righteous, one-way, legal/moral screen [with] positive images of western values and innocence portrayed as threatened, validating a campaign of unrestricted violence"? Catching war criminals is fashionable again. Radovan Karadzic stands in the dock, but Sharon and Olmert, Bush and Blair do not. Why not? The memory of Hiroshima requires an answer.

preklad zdroj:http://www.outsidermedia.cz/Kdo-lhal-o-Hirosime-lze-i-o-dnesku-1.aspx
Když jsem v roce 1967 poprvé přijel do Hirošimy, byl stále ještě vidět stín na schodišti. Bylo to dokonalé zobrazení ženy ve stavu pohody: roztažené nohy, prohnutá záda, opřená o jednu ruku tak, jak čekala, až se otevře banka. 6. srpna 1945 ve čtvrt na devět ráno byla její silueta vypálena do žuly. Zíral jsem na její stín snad hodinu a pak jsem šel k řece, kde jsem potkal muže jménem Jukio, jehož prsa byla stále poznačena vzorem košile, kterou měl na sobě, když byla shozena atomová bomba.

On se svou rodinou stále ještě žil v chatrči, postavené v prachu atomové pouště. Popsal mi obrovský záblesk nad městem „modrý svit, něco jako „elektrický oblouk při zkratu“, po kterém se vítr roztočil jako tornádo a padal černý déšť: „Porazilo mne to na zem a před sebou jsem viděl jen stonky tam, kde předtím byly mé květiny. Všude bylo ticho a klid, ale když jsem se zvedl, viděl jsem mlčící ochromené nahé lidi. Někteří neměli ani kůži ani vlasy. Byl jsem si jist, že jsem po smrti.“ Když jsem se po dalších 9 letech vrátil, už nežil, zemřel na leukémii.

Spojenecké okupační úřady zákázaly okamžitě po bombardování veškeré zmínky o radioaktivním spadu a trvaly na tom, že lidé byli zabiti nebo zraněni pouze výbuchem bomby. Byla to první lež. „Ruiny Hirošimy nejsou radioaktivní“ byl titulek na první stránce New York Times, klasická ukázka dezinformace a žurnalistické zbabělosti, což napravil až australský reportér Wilfred Burchett svým článkem století. „Píši toto jako varování světu,“ napsal Burchett v listu Daily Express, když zranění umírali na to, co nazval „atomovým morem“. Protože napsal pravdu, byla jeho novinářská akreditace zrušena, byl pranýřován, špiněn, ale nakonec obhájen.

Atomové bombardování Hirošimy a Nagasaki bylo kriminálním činem neuvěřitelného rozsahu. Byla to předem připravení masová vražda, která pustila z řemene kriminální zbraň. Z toho důvodu její obhájci hledali spásu v mytologii „dobré války“, jejíž „etická očistná lázeň“ (jak to nazval Richard Drayton) dovolila, aby si Západ nejen odpykal svou krvavou imperiální minulost, ale dopřál si 60 let hrabivých válek, vždy chráněn stínem Bomby.

Nejtrvalejší lží, je to, že „bomba byla shozena, aby se urychlil konec války v Pacifiku a uchránily se lidské životy“. Americká studie o strategickém bombardování z r. 1946 učinila následující závěr „I bez atomového útoku by vzdušná převaha nad Japonskem vyvinula dostatečný tlak, aby se docílilo bezpodmínečné kapitulace bez nutnosti invaze. Na základě detailního průzkumu všech faktů a podle výpovědí těch japonských velitelů, kteří přežili, je názorem této Studie že … Japonsko by se bylo vzdalo, i kdyby atomové bomby nebyly shozeny, Rusko nevstoupilo do války, a nebyla plánována invaze do Japonska.“

Národní archiv ve Washingtonu obsahuje americké vládní dokumenty, které mapují japonskou předehru k mírovým jednáním už v r. 1943. Jednání se neuskutečnilo. Telegram, zaslaný německým velvyslancem v Tokiu 5. května 1945, zachycený Američany, rozptyluje jakékoliv pochybnosti, že by Japonci zoufale netoužili domoci se jednání o míru, včetně přijetí kapitulace „i kdyby podmínky byly tvrdé“. Namísto toho americký ministr války Henry Stimson řekl presidentu Trumanovi, že se obává, že americké letectvo vybombarduje Japonsko tak, že nová zbraň nedostane příležitost „ukázat svou sílu“. Stimson později přiznal, že „nebylo vyvinuto žádné úsilí a nebylo o něm ani vážně uvažováno, aby se dosáhla kapitulace s cílem bombu nepoužít“. Jeho kolegové toužili, aby „mohli zastrašit Rusy Bombou, ostentativně pověšenou na opasku“. Generál Leslie Groves, ředitel Projektu Manhattan svědčil: „Neměl jsem žádnou iluzi o tom, že by Rusko nebylo náš nepřítel a že projekt byl veden na základě tohoto faktu.“ Den poté, co byla zničena Hirošima, vyjádřil president Truman svoje uspokojení nad „obrovským úspěchem tohoto pokusu“.
(Pozn. překladatele: Vzpomínám na kreslený vtip z podzimu 1945, kde na přehlídce pochodují obrovské ešelony ruských vojáků a pak jede jediné americké auto s bednou, označenou „atomová bomba“, následované vojenskou hudbou.)

Předpokládá se, že od r. 1945 byly Spojené státy nejméně třikrát na mezi rozhodnutí použít atomovou bombu. Při proklamování svého falešného hesla „boje proti teroru“ současné vlády ve Washingtonu a v Londýně vyhlásily, že jsou připraveny provést preventivní atomové údery proti beznukleárním státům. S každým krokem, přibližujícím nukleární Armageddon, jsou lži o oprávněnosti takového kroku stále více pobuřující. Současnou „hrozbou“ je Irán. Ale Irán nemá nukleární arsenál a dezinformace jsou od iránské opoziční skupiny MEK (podporované z CIA) – stejně jako lži o zbraních hromadného ničení Saddáma Husajna pocházely z Iráckého národního kongresu, vytvořeného Washingtonem.

Role západní žurnalistiky ve vytvoření tohoto strašáku je kritická. Americký Defence Intelligence Estimate uvádí, že „s vysokou pravděpodobností“ Irán přerušil svůj program atomového vyzbrojování v r. 2003. Nikoho nezajímá, že iránský prezident Mahmúd Ahmadínežád nikdy nevyhrožoval „smazáním Izraele z mapy“. Ale tato mantra žije tak, že Gordon Brown ve svém proslovu před izraelským parlamentem ji opět použil k výhrůžce Iránu.

Tento sled lží nás přivedl k jedné z největších krizí od r. 1945, protože skutečná hrozba je bez diskuse v západních vládních kruzích a mediích. Na Blízkém Východě je jediná nekontrolovatelná nukleární mocnost - a tou je Izrael. Odvážný Mordechai Vanunu se v r. 1986 snažil varovat svět, když vyvezl důkazy, že Izrael buduje sílu nejméně 200 nukleárních hlavic. Bez ohledu na rezoluce OSN má Izrael svědění napadnout Irán a to z obavy, že nová americká vláda může, skutečně jen možná může, zahájit skutečná jednání s národem, který byl Západem pošpiněn, když Velká Británie a USA svrhly v r. 1953 demokratickou vládu v Iránu.

Izraelský historik Benny Morris, který byl kdysi považován za liberála, a který je nyní politickým a vojenským poradcem své vlády, ve svém článku v New York Times z 18. července letošního roku pohrozil, že „Irán může být přeměněn na nukleární poušť“. To by byla masová vražda. Pokud to pronáší Žid, je to ironie osudu.

Zůstává otázka: Jsme my ostatní pouhými diváky, kteří tvrdí, tak jako to říkali dobří Němci „my nic nevíme“? Schováváme se čím dál tím více ta to, co Richard Falk nazval „pokryteckou, jednosměrnou, legálně/morální zástěnou s namalovanými kladnými obrázky ohrožených západních hodnot a nevinnosti, což umožňuje konat kampaň neomezeného násilí“? Lovit válečné zločince je opět v módě, Radovan Karadžič je před soudem, ale Sharon, Omert, Bush a Blair nejsou. Proč? Vzpomínka na Hirošimu vyžaduje odpověď.

streda 28. júla 2010

Human Rights in the New Millennium by Noam Chomsky


It is significant that the U.S. is self-exempted from international law

Before trying to address the current state of human rights, it is worth considering what is admitted into that sacred canon. The question constantly arises, quite concretely. For example, on the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty in October, when Amnesty International declared that, "Poverty is the world's worst human rights crisis." Or two days before that, on World Food Day, when the UN food agency reported that the number of people going hungry rose to over 1 billion, while rich countries sharply cut back food aid because of the priority of bailing out banks, and Oxfam reported that 16,000 children are dying a day from hunger-related causes—that is twice Rwanda-level killing just among children—not for 100 days, but every day, and increasing. And the issues regularly arise even in the richest country in the world, where the question of whether health care is a human right is being hotly debated while some 45,000 people a year die from lack of insurance, unknown numbers from utterly inadequate insurance, in the only industrial society I know of where health care is rationed by wealth, not need.

In all these cases, the lives could be saved by a tiny fraction of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the rich countries, so the question is whether they recognize the right to life as among human rights.

There is a gold standard on human rights—the founding documents of the UN—the Charter, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UD). The charter guarantees the right to be protected from what was declared at Nuremberg to be the "supreme international crime," differing from other war crimes in that it encompasses all the evil that follows: the crime of aggression, which is reasonably well-defined. In practice, the Charter has long ago been revoked. Article 2(4) is in the wastebasket. There are sophisticated arguments in the international law literature to show that it doesn't mean what it says, when we carry out aggression, that is; no such questions arise when Russia or Saddam Hussein do.

The U.S. has been, in large measure, the global sovereign since World War II and remains so despite the increasing diversity of the global economy in past decades. Hence its practices are of great significance in considering the prospects for human rights. It is, for example, of great significance that the U.S. is self-exempted from international law—John F. Kennedy's armed attack against South Vietnam in 1962—to mention one case of no slight import that took place in the real world, but not in official history, opening the most severe crimes of aggression since World War II.
>>>>more read on the link above>>>>>>>

utorok 20. júla 2010

Western Savagery Ready to Unleash Nuclear War on the World Based on Lies

Western Savagery Ready to Unleash Nuclear War on the World Based on Lies

The history of endless US savagery reads like a horror story. Of course there was Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Just a little preview of things to come when a monster gets its hands on weapons of mass destruction.

When they first started feeling their oats after the Warsaw Pact was disbanded, there was the savage, murderous attack on Yugoslavia for a pack of lies. Damage done to Yugoslavia was estimated to be USD 30 billion. In the 78 days of the attacks, 540 buildings were destroyed, 58 bridges and 30,000 homes.

There were 146 air raid alarms which combined lasted for 774 hours, for an average of 9 hours and 55 minutes a day. The insatiable lunatics were flying over 650 sorties every night. Talk about savagery and overkill, lack of civilization and absolute terrorism, not to mention the war crime of collective punishment of Yugoslav civilians who were expected to rise up against their leadership because they had been sufficiently terrorized.

Is this the way a respectable nation behaves, a nation who expects everyone else on the face of the Earth to be a carbon copy of themselves?

At one point during the bombing, NATO spokesman Jamie Shea likewise said the following:

"If President Milošević really wants all of his population to have water and electricity all he has to do is accept NATO's five conditions and we will stop this campaign."

Right, just like that, roll over, bend the knee and allow NATO to do whatever it wants.

Then there was Iraq. A completely devastated infrastructure, over a million dead and people still dying and suffering...much of the environment plagued with nuclear contamination, NATO totally wrecked the place. Again, all because of lies.

Then Afghanistan, now being forced to reveal and surrender its great resources, not to mention the lucrative drug trade, the heroin and opium, now being mass produced thanks to NATO.

What Part of "Bans the use or threat of force" does the US and Israel not understand? This is part and parcel of the UN Charter.

Specifically, in UN Resolution 1887 of September 2009, the Security Council reaffirmed the call for all states to resolve nuclear issues peacefully in accordance with the Charter, which bans the use or threat of force.

Iran's military doctrine is strictly defensive ... designed to prevent any invasion force from occupying the country. Iran is also committed to diplomatic solutions to hostilities or disputes. Iran only has "limited ability" to project force beyond its borders. Studies done make clear that the Iranian "threat" is not military. Iranian military spending is low compared with others in the region, and less than 2% of that of the U.S.

US efforts to slander and lie about Iran's peaceful nuclear program range from the outright fabrication of documents recently discovered in at least two instances, to trying to silence the IAEA and Director General, Mohamed El Baradei, who just cannot be convinced to lie for them.

Anyone remember the fabricated document purporting to show an Iraqi effort to buy uranium in Niger, which was used by George Bush as part of his propaganda efforts in the buildup to the Iraq invasion of 2003? It's happening again and there is no excuse for people to be unmindful and especially silent that it's happening again.

Why is it constantly ignored in the western corporate media and by all the lying political buffoons that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa forbidding the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons on August 9, 2005. The full text of the fatwa was released in an official statement at the meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna. That ostensibly should settle the matter once and for all.

What part of "it is forbidden" do they not understand?

Now regarding the threats against Iran, what are Israeli warships doing, for the first time, in the Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s maritime areas? They are accompanied by a US fleet whose declared mission is "to implement sanctions against Iran and oversee the ships arriving or departing Iran." British and Israeli media reported that Saudi Arabia is providing a corridor for the Israeli bombing of Iran (Saudi Arabia denies this, another lie).

Military equipment being prepared for the aggression against Iran includes 387 "bunker busters" [bunker buster bombs] used to attack fortified subterranean structures. Preparations for these "massive attacks" with bunker busters, the most powerful bombs in the small arsenal of nuclear weapons began in the Bush administration. Upon taking office, Obama immediately accelerated the plans in order to target Iran.

"They are in high gear for the destruction of Iran," said Dan Plesch, director of the Center for International Studies and Diplomacy at the University of London. "Bomber and long-range missiles are ready today to destroy 10,000 targets in Iran in a few hours," he said.

Again, Operation Overkill; Operation Terrorize the People; Operation Destroy a Country; Operation Contaminate the Land and Kill and Deform Generations to Come. They are planning nothing as they state, it's not going to be a mere "surgical strike." The US and Israel love to whine and play the terrorism victim card, but they themselves are the worst terrorists this world has ever seen.

Current activities of the Empire have led revolutionary leader, Fidel Castro, to gloomily predict that nuclear war will soon be upon the world. It is a resignation that cannot be taken lightly, knowing the courage that was required for all the many successes of this man's life.

Every country's leaders need to be called to account for their mindless lockstep with Washington on this planned attack, as well as the sanctions. Who do these leaders work for, their people or Washington/Tel Aviv?

At this point, we can only ask the creative power that brought the universe into being (whatever your particular faith or belief system uses for a name) and all that we know as good, pure and beautiful, to put a protective hand on the great people of Iran and spare them and us the planned horror, put every obstacle in the path of the dogs of war, the evil empire, the greedy gluttonous forces of hell that base themselves in the USA and Israel.



Neurvalost Západu hrozí rozpoutat světovou jadernou válku založenou na lžích.

Historie nekonečné americké brutality připomíná hororový příběh. Samozřejmě tu byly Hirošima a Nagasaki. Pouze malá ukázka věcí budoucích, toho, co se stane, když monstrum dostane do svých rukou zbraně hromadného ničení.

Když poprvé pocítili možnost sklízet úrodu po rozpuštění Varšavského paktu, došlo k barbarskému vražednému útoku na Jugoslávii na základě snůšky lží. Škody způsobené Jugoslávii byly odhadnuty na 30 miliard dolarů, za 78 dní útoků bylo zničeno 540 budov, 58 mostů a 30,000 domovů.

Celkem proběhlo146 leteckých poplachů, které dohromady trvaly 774 hodin, v průměru 9 hodin a 55 minut denně. Tito maniakální šílenci prováděli každou noc 650 náletů. Mluvíme o barbarismu a masakrování, necivilizovanosti a čistém terorismu, a to nemluvě o válečném zločinu kolektivního trestu vůči jugoslávským civilistům, po němž měli povstat proti svému vedení, protože už měli mít dost terorizování.

Je toto způsob, jakým se chová úctyhodný stát, který očekává, že všichni ostatní na zemském povrchu jej budou věrně napodobovat?

V určitém okamžiku bombardování mluvčí NATO Jamie Shea prohlásil:

„Pokud prezident Miloševič opravdu chce, aby všichni jeho obyvatelé měli vodu a elektřinu, tak jediné, co musí udělat, je přijmout pět podmínek NATO a my s touto kampaní přestaneme.“

Přesně tak, zabalte to, padněte na kolena, a nechte, ať si NATO dělá, co chce.

Potom Irák. Kompletně zničená infrastruktura, více než milion mrtvých, a lidé tam stále umírají a trpí… z velké části v důsledku prostředí zamořeného jadernou kontaminací. NATO z celého toho místa udělalo ruiny. A opět, vše se stalo na základě lží.

Další na řadě byl Afghánistán, který je nyní nucen odhalit a vzdát se svých bohatých nerostných zdrojů, a to nemluvíme o lukrativním obchodu s drogami, o masové výrobě heroinu a opia v režii NATO.

Jaké části „ Zákazu používání síly nebo vyhrožování silou “ USA a Izrael nechápou? To je přece podstatá část Charty OSN.

V rezoluci OSN číslo 1887 ze září 2009 Rada bezpečnosti znova výslovně potvrdila výzvu všem státům světa, aby řešily jadernou otázkou mírově, v souladu s Chartou, která zakazuje používání síly nebo vyhrožování silou.

Íránská vojenská doktrína je přísně obranná … s cílem zabránit jakékoliv invazi a okupaci země. Írán je také zavázán k diplomatickému řešení nepřátelských činů a sporů. Írán má pouze „ omezenou schopnost “ uplatňovat sílu mimo své hranice. Provedené studie jasně ukazují, že íránská „ hrozba “ není vojenská. Íránské vojenské výdaje jsou v porovnání s jinými zeměmi v regionu nízké, a činí méně než 2% výdajů amerických.

Snaha USA pomlouvat íránský mírový jaderný program a lhát o něm mělo rozsah od přímého falšování dokumentů, jak bylo zjištěno v posledních dvou případech, k pokusu umlčet MAAE a Mohameda El Baradeje, kterého prostě nešlo přesvědčit, aby pro ně lhal.

Vzpomíná si někdo na zfalšovaný dokument, který údajně ukazoval, že se Irák snažil koupit uran v Nigeru, a který byl použit Georgem Bushem jako součást jeho propagandy ve snaze připravit invazi do Iráku v r. 2003? Děje se to opět, a neexistuje žádná výmluva, aby se o to lidé nestarali a mlčeli, zvláště když to není poprvé a znovu se to opakuje.

Proč je ze strany západních korporátních médií a všech těch prolhaných politických tatrmanů tak vytrvale ignorováno, že ajatolláh Ali Chamenei vydal již 9. srpna 2005 fatwu, zakazující výrobu, uskladňování a používání jaderných zbraní? Úplný text této fatwy byl zveřejněn v oficiálním prohlášení na setkání Mezinárodní agentury pro atomovou energii (MAAE) ve Vídni. To zdánlivě mělo s touto věcí skoncovat jednou provždy.

Jakou část z tohoto " tabu “ nechápou“?

Co se týká hrozeb vůči Íránu, co dělají izraelské lodě poprvé v Perském zálivu, Hormuzské úžině a v námořních oblastech Íránu? Jsou doprovázeny americkou flotilou, jejíž deklarovanou misí je „zavést sankce proti Íránu a dohlížet na lodě připlouvající a odplouvající z Íránu“ . Britská a izraelská média oznámila, že Saúdská Arábie poskytla koridor pro izraelské bombardování Íránu (Saudská Arábie to popírá, tedy další lež).

K vojenskému vybavení, které je připravováno pro agresi vůči Íránu, patří 387 „ bunker busters “ (bomb k ničení podzemních bunkrů), používaných pro útok na opevněné podzemní struktury. Přípravy na tyto „masivní útoky“ za použití protibunkrových bomb, nejvýkonnějších bomb z „malého“ jaderného arzenálu, začaly za Bushovy vlády. Po nástupu do úřadu Obama okamžitě tyto plány urychlil, aby se mohlo na Írán zaútočit.

„Jedou na plné obrátky, aby zničili Írán,“ řekl Dan Plesch, ředitel Centra mezinárodních studií a diplomacie při Londýnské univerzitě (Center for International Studies and Diplomacy at the University of London). „Bombardéry a střely s dlouhým doletem jsou dnes připraveny zničit v Íránu 10,000 cílů během několika hodin,“ řekl.

Opět, operace Masakr, operace Terorizuj lidi, operace Znič zem; operace Kontaminuj půdu, Zavraždi a zmrzač další generaci. Jak říkají, neplánují nic jiného, než pouhý „ chirurgický řez “. USA a Izrael milují fňukání a rádi ze sebe dělají oběti terorismu, ale sami jsou to nejhorší teroristé, které tento svět kdy viděl.

Současné aktivity Impéria přiměly revolučního vůdce Fidela Castra, aby ponuře předpověděl, že svět brzy čeká jaderná válka. To je beznaděj, kterou nelze brát na lehkou váhu, když víme, jakou odvahu si vyžadovaly mnohé úspěchy v životě tohoto muže.

Vůdce všech zemí je potřeba volat k zodpovědnosti za svoji bezduchou podporu Washingtonu tomuto plánovanému útoku i sankcím. Pro koho tito vůdci pracují, pro svůj lid, nebo pro Washington či Tel Aviv?

V tuto chvíli můžeme pouze požádat onu tvůrčí sílu, která dala vzniknout vesmíru (ať už ji jakákoliv víra nebo náboženství nazývá jakkoliv), a kterou známe jako dobrou, čistou a krásnou, aby vztáhla svoji ochrannou ruku nad vznešený lid Íránu a ušetřila jej i nás před plánovanými hrůzami a postavila všechny možné překážky do cesty válečným štváčům, impériu zla a všem hrabivým nenažraným silám pekla, které mají základnu v USA a Izraeli.

Článek Western Savagery Ready to Unleash Nuclear War on the World Based on Lies vyšel 7. července na serveru Pravda.ru.
Překlad: Stan

utorok 1. júna 2010

Again, Zionists Set Up Jews for Holocaust by Henry Makow


Israel is the primary source of anti-Semitism in the world today, and jeopardizes the security of all Jews. Proclaiming itself the "Jewish State" but acting as a rogue state, Israel exposes all Jews to revulsion and retribution.

The murder of Gaza peace activists provides more evidence that the actual goal of Zionism is not to protect Jews from anti-Semitism but in fact, is to create anti-Semitism.

nedeľa 16. mája 2010

What It Means To Be Poor....

"How you see the world. How you deal with it. That determines your real wealth."
– God (from the Joan of Arcadia TV series)

One day, the father of a very wealthy family took his son on a trip to the country with the express purpose of showing him how poor people live. They spent a couple of days and nights on the farm of what would be considered a very poor family. On their return from their trip, the father asked his son, "How was the trip?"

"It was great, Dad."

"Did you see how poor people live?" the father asked.

"Oh yeah," said the son.

"So, tell me, what did you learn from the trip?", asked the father

The son answered:

"I saw that we have one dog and they had four.

We have a pool that reaches to the middle of our garden and they have a creek that has no end.

We have imported lanterns in our garden and they have the stars at night.

Our patio reaches to the front yard and they have the whole horizon.

We have a small piece of land to live on and they have fields that go beyond our sight.

We have servants who serve us, but they serve others.

We buy our food, but they grow theirs.

We have walls around our property to protect us, they have friends to protect them."

The boy's father was speechless. Then his son added...

"Thanks Dad for showing me how poor we are."

When I found  this story, I was touched.... and I'm grateful to pass it along to all my friends as well.
I'd also like to take this moment and thank my parents, family, friends, and of course you....

The love and support you and others have shown me throughout my life and especially recent times of challenge and change reminds me how truly abundant I am, regardless of what life sends my way...

sobota 15. mája 2010


Lord, bless me this morning,
as I make my way
Please give me the laughter
to warm someone’s day
Be sure I am steady,
be sure I am wise
Be sure I am ready,
should struggles arise
If I shed a tear,
Lord, I pray you will see
I’m making the most
of the chores asked of me
As I strive to put
others’ needs ‘fore my own
Always stand beside me,
so I’m not alone.

author: unknown

piatok 14. mája 2010

N. Chomsky: Radar is attack, not defence - Radar je útok, ne obrana!

http://www.nenasili.cz/ N. Chomsky: "The talk of Jan Tamáš with professional. Noam Chomsky.
N. Chomsky: "The struggle of prevention of development the military bases plus rocket system defences in Poland plus Czech republic has extraordinary meaning. In reality isn't exaggeration tell, that the fate of all living existence in this planet depends on those decisions"."

Rozhovor Jana Tamáše s prof. Noamem Chomskym.

"Zápas o zabránění rozvoje vojenských základen a systému raketové obrany v Polsku a České republice má mimořádný význam. Ve skutečnosti není nadsázkou říci, že osud druhů na této planetě závisí na těchto rozhodnutích".

piatok 23. apríla 2010

Emotional independence

“At the beginning of our life and again when we get old, we need the help and affection of others.
Unfortunately, between these two periods of our life, when we are strong and able to look after ourselves, we don’t appreciate the value of affection and compassion.
As our own life begins and ends with the need for affection, wouldn't’t it be better if we gave compassion and love to others while we are strong and capable?”

The above words were said by the present Dal-ai Lama.
Really, it is very curious to see that we are proud of our emotional independence. 
Evidently, it is not quite like that: we continue needing others our entire life, but it is a “shame” to show that, so we prefer to cry in hiding.
And when someone asks us for help, that person is considered weak and incapable of controlling his feelings.

There is an unwritten rule saying that “the world is for the strong”, that “only the fittest survive.”
If it were like that, human beings would never have existed, because they are part of a species that needs to be protected for a long period of time (specialists say that we are only capable of surviving on our own after nine years of age, whereas a giraffe takes only six to eight months, and a bee is already independent in less than five minutes).

We are in this world to continue depending on others. Depend on parents, husband, wife,  friends , publishers...etc.
We depend even on our enemies, who help use to be always trained in the use of the sword.
Clearly, there are moments when this fire blows in another direction, but we have to always ask ourselves: where are the others? Have I isolated myself too much? Like any healthy person, we also need solitude and moments of reflection.
But we cannot get addicted to that.

Emotional independence leads to absolutely nowhere – except to a would-be fortress, whose only and useless objective is to impress others.

Emotional dependence, in its turn, is like a bonfire that we light.

In the beginning, relationships are difficult. In the same way that fire is necessary to put up with the disagreeable smoke – which makes breathing hard, and causes tears to pour down one’s face. However, once the fire is alight, the smoke disappears and the flames light up everything around us – spreading warmth, calm, and possibly making an ember pop out to burn us, but that is what makes a relationship interesting, isn't’t that true?
On beginning of this column was quoted a Nobel Peace Prize winner about the importance of human relationships.
Let us to end it with Professor Albert Schweitzer, physician and missionary, who received the same Nobel prize in 1952.
"All of us know a disease in Central Africa called sleeping sickness.
What we need to know is that there is a similar disease that attacks the soul – and which is very dangerous, because it catches us without being noticed. When you notice the slightest sign of indifference and lack of enthusiasm for your similar, be on the alert!”

"The only way to take precautions against this disease is to understand that the soul suffers, and suffers a lot, when we make it live superficially.
The soul likes things that are beautiful and profound”.

source : http://www.warriorofthelight.com/engl/index.html

utorok 20. apríla 2010

Some Easter snapshots

Spring in the High Tatra Mountains

"My sons with their family had undertook a families trip into the our Slovak biggest mountains to enjoy of beauty of them, to breath a good fresh air, to enjoy the last hints of snow and to awakening of Tatras Bear....I hope you will it enjoy as well....:)"

štvrtok 25. marca 2010

According to "Welt der Wunder" CO2 is a "death gas"

It was anticipated, the NWO had to start a counteroffensive because Climategate and German media have now taken part willingly to get the CO2 lie upright.

  Thus, the magazine "Welt der Wunder" spent a full 14 pages for hammer to the readers: "CO2 will soon kill millions of people." And on the front page the question is asked: "Can we catch the death gas again?"

  Why the death gas will kill millions of people, they demonstrate not.

Can people this agitation, panic and even falsity surpass?

  I have picked out some of the headlines and phrases from the article, which represent one of the worst propaganda:

- Climate poison CO2
- CO2, a molecule can destroy the earth?
- CO2 is about to kill millions of people
- Bring the climate out of time and poison the oceans
- The oceans are fighting (against the CO2)
- The collapse threatens long
- Now start the science of hunting, the molecule of ruin
- The invisible killer
- If we soon run out of air?
- Expulsion from Paradise (because of the alleged increase in sea level)
- The characteristics of a killer: how toxic is CO2 really?
- From the summit of Everest to the depths of the oceans - all unfolds his uncanny power CO2
- And we have unleashed this demon at all until
- What is this gas danger our civilization?
- The effect is enormous. It will change the whole earth
- In a globalized world, we are all suffering from climate chaos
- Can carbon dioxide extinguish an entire people?
- The destructive gas
- Living in the black hell
- Where has given up the nature of the struggle for survival already
- Will the steaks take us the air?
- The CO2 now calls his first victims in the sea
- It ccertainly will not be a walk, more obviously a race to the death

  The proponents of the climate warming cult must be powerful in panic when they have to resort to the methods of Nazi propaganda.  Goebbels would be proud of them.  Their demagoguery is bottom drawer.

  Here is a list of allegations do not agree:

 1st. It is claimed, CO2 gas would be a death.  Oh yeah?  We breathe it out but.

 2nd. It is claimed, CO2 is by far the most dangerous gas in the world. Completely absurd.  Then yes, the military would have to use it as a weapon.  They use it to delete more than fire.  Also, if you in a bar the next time a drink is mixed, who know so beautiful bubbles and smokes, then it, it is a toxic cocktail that do that is pure frozen CO2 (dry ice) for the effect.

  3rd  It is alleged that the number of molecules (CO2 in the air) would be alarmingly high, but immediately contradicts itself in which it is said, the proportion was only 0.039 percent.

  4th  It is claimed that the CO2 level was 0.039 percent.  The truth is 0.0387 percent. It is not mentioned, the measurement at Mauna Loa, a volcano in Hawaii.  Because we can measure just as good also on the exhaust of a car. This, however, of which 95 percent come from nature and only 5 percent of people who conceal the items.

  5th  It is claimed that the ozone layer than CO2 would shield the Earth at risk.  In fact, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) cause.

   6th It is claimed, CO2 particles store heat solar heat on the climate and produce the greenhouse effect.  First, CO2 molecules are not "particles", because such are described as small solid state, such as the solid components of aerosols, suspensions or powders. Then, the proportion of CO2 in the stratosphere, where it is supposed to be so harmful, only 0.001 percent, as CO2 is 1.5 times heavier than air and is staying near the ground. Third, the so-called greenhouse effect of CO2 on very little involved, because water vapor is about 70 percent, the biggest cause and together with the clouds as much as 85 percent.  Then there are 17 other gases are considered as such.

  7th  It is claimed that CO2 has always been part of our atmosphere, but only in small quantities and it is hinted at 0.039 percent would be very high.  In fact, we live in a CO2 geological seen poor time, because in the last 600 million years ago, the CO2 level up to 18 times higher and there were ice ages there was CO2 12 times higher than today. The effect of CO2 is no big temperature increase, but conversely, if the temperature rises through the solar activity increases the CO2 with a time delay of 800 years.

   8th It is claimed that the CO2 does not collect on the ground. Tell that time a fireman or the mountain people, who know that in wells collects CO2.

   9th  It is alleged that the Maldives will become submerged.  The fact is, the sea level has settled.  The President makes only one to panic, because he overpopulation to the mainland and get rid of money from industrialized nations will.
  10th  It is alleged that the polar bears and seals are dying.  It has increased fivefold since 1950, the polar bear population and they are doing splendidly.

  11th It is claimed that the Inuit Schmitz, the ice under the feet away.  In reality, the ice of the North Pole in 2009 compared to 2007 grew by 30 percent and in the normal range.

   12th  It is claimed that the CO2 would poison the oceans and dissolve coral and shells.
 In fact, it is the largest reef in Australia, the Great Barrier Reef, the best and the ocean temperatures have not increased there.

  13th  It is claimed that trees would be composed by the high CO2 emissions.  Every botanist and gardener knows, however, plants and trees grow better and better, the higher the CO2 concentration.

  14th . It is claimed that forests are not the optimal CO2 storage. These studies show not only the young forest is growing, but even old forest takes tons of CO2, store it as wood and gives off oxygen.
  15th  It is alleged that the Nenets in Russia could bring the reindeer herds not because of the thawed soil in the winter. In fact, Russia experienced the most severe early winter at all.

  16th  It is claimed that threatens CO2 mountaineers and farmers in Nepal, because of melting glaciers, avalanches and rock falls.  The reason for the melting of glaciers is not the CO2, but the fine dust and soot of the bears on the ice and a black layer forms, which absorbs the heat energy.

  17th It is claimed that CO2 is lethal at a concentration of 8 percent within minutes.  To achieve this, the proportion in the atmosphere would increase at the 200-fold.That means we can keep the output rate of 2 ppm per year allegedly for the next 40,000 years to get to the "lethal" concentration.

  18th  It is claimed that the CO2 would result in more energy for extreme weather and hurricanes. In fact, in 2009 the quietest year ever in terms hurricanes and storms.

  19th  It is alleged that because of the increase in the proportion of CO2 in the air by industrialization, the average temperature has risen global strong and will rapidly increase.  In fact, the increase is minimal body, only 0.5 degrees in the last 100 years, which is within the normal fluctuation, and for 10 years takes place no change.  The trend is more of a slowdown.

  20th It is claimed that an increase in temperature of 2 degrees or more and a warm climate would be a disaster for humanity.  A completely false statement and an error.  If you look at the history of the last 3,000 years looks at, then there was always first, alternating hot and cold period, so a normal climate change and is controlled by the sun. Second, the warm periods were Immm a cultural flowering, it was the people well and they benefited from a warm climate.  Just cold periods were bad, there was famine, mass extinctions and the civilization declined.

The worst thing we can is not a climate warming, but a Klimabkühlung, that would really be a disaster, such as human history shows!

Then environmental damage are listed, with the CO2 that have nothing to do, such as:

  1st  Sulfur dioxide and metal particulates from the copper processing plants in Russia.

  2nd Slash and burn for meat production.  Who authorized this and who is running the factory farming?  It is the governments and agricultural groups.

  3rd  Ruminant free in their digestion, the greenhouse gas methane.  Aha, so there are still other "climate killer" out of CO2.

  4th  Forests are cut down in Canada because of the oil sands.  And? Who allows this and runs it?  The Canadian government and the oil companies, not us.

  The article in "World of Wonders" is a terrible tirades against the CO2 and supported by no evidence or facts. The text consists only of polemic, key words, far-fetched examples, and defamation.

  The best own contribution would reduce the CO2 it, if this lubrication sheet would cease to exist and no more wasted paper useless to spread their lies.  Many trees would therefore no longer be made. Let them go a good example if they think the CO2 would be a death gas.

My advice, buy this trash issue is not, otherwise you will support it yet.  It is enough if I had to make it as a template. I use it now to light my fireplace.

The military is the largest environmental criminal

No word is mentioned that the U.S. military is the largest single CO2 producer in the world and is specifically excluded from any climate agreement since Kyoto.  13 million liters of gasoline consumed, the U.S. war machine in Iraq and Afghanistan per day in 2007!  Today it is much more. The wars that the West is conducting all over the world to end, would most bring to the environment and save lives, because that really there is a destruction of our planet and a mass killing.

If CO2 is alleged as a cause of global warming and the U.S. military's largest producer of CO2, then, any climate debate that does not includes the U.S. military, a farce and just hot air.  But we hear anything about it?  If the IPCC, Greenpeace, WWF, Green or other so-called environmentalists and state leaders of the Western ever mentioned the war and the military because of the massive CO2 emissions and is required only for environmental reasons, one end of the war?  Certainly not.  In their eyes we are only guilty, must pay us, and will restrict. This shows what incredible hypocrites they are, and they pursue agenda.

I will not what the governments of the CO2 and global warming say seriously until they end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

What is climate change really?

  Let me say what really changed the climate change always has and it always will.  It is the sun and its changing radiation of heat energy and comic particles.  The cosmic radiation and the solar wind controls the formation of clouds and determine how much heat reaches the earth, or reflected. The main factor for a so-called greenhouse effect is the water vapor and clouds in the atmosphere.  CO2 has only a minimal effect, if any.

Therefore, we can reduce CO2 as much as we want, it changes in the sun and their radiation at all.  The CO2 to make the people responsible for climate change, is the biggest mistake of the century and a lie. All measures are based on this lie, false and should not be accepted.

translated from german source :

streda 24. marca 2010

Peter Russel : The Global Brain

This audiovisual presentation inspired by the book The Global Brain stated the idea that the Earth is an integrated, self- regulating living organism. What is then the role for mankind, for this living planetary being? It is assumed that we are on the threshold of an important evolutionary jump, important for mankind and a nature of this jump is inner spiritual development.

Presentation is already over twenty years old but forever it is highly actual. This video is with English sound but there are  a Slovak captions. If you want to see it without captions you can find the original video here: http://www.peterrussell.com/GB/GBVide

The human heart can go the length of God,
Dark and cold we may be, but this is no winter now.
The frozen misery of centuries cracks, breaks, begins to move,
The thunder is the thunder of the floes,
The thaw, the flood, the upstart Spring,
Thank God our time is now,
When wrong comes up to meet us everywhere,
Never to leave us till we take,
the greatest stride of soul man ever took.
Affairs are now soul size,
The enterprise is exploration into God,
But where are you making for,
It takes so many thousand years to wake,
but will you wake, for pity's sake......

utorok 19. januára 2010

The Superconscious Mind

Is Your Unlimited Source of
Abundance, Happiness and Prosperity

All creation is the result of consciousness. The superconscious mind contains within itself the infinite possibility of anything that can be conceived with mind.

What is superconscious mind?

A long time ago Emerson wrote:

“There is one mind common to all individual men. Every man is an inlet to the same and to all of the same. He that is once admitted to the right of reason is made a freeman of the whole estate. What Plato has thought, he may think; what a saint has felt, he may feel; what at any time has befallen any man, he can understand. Who hath access to this Universal Mind, is a party to all that is or can be done, for is the only and sovereign agent.”

Some people called it God, Universal Mind, Higher Intelligence, Supreme Energy, Higher Source, Higher Mind, Inner Mind, Universal Intelligence, etc. The scientific community refers to it as "The Unified Field" or "Infinite Field Of Potentiality."

It does not matter what label it is given, what really matter is: This is the one and only force that both science and spirituality have acknowledged as the mastermind behind all the creations in the universe.

Here, we shall call it the superconscious mind or super consciousness. It holds the power to create any conceivable outcome. It has no boundaries or limitations in its power to create - from the infinitely large to the infinitely small, from the microscopic to the greatest of the universe.

In some organized religion, it is known as The Alpha, The Omega, The Beginning, The End. The All in All. The I Am.

While it is impossible to precisely describe something that is infinite and holds no boundary, some people have described The super consciousness in the following ways:

* It consists of all things in the past, now and future.

* It is omniscient and omnipresent.

* It encompasses all things both the seen as well as the unseen.

All that already exist in physical form or are still being conceptualized in the mind are within the super consciousness.

From the emotional perspective, the superconscious mind contains all feeing and emotion such as love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self control as well as fear, sadness, turmoil, anger, greed, etc. It has everything that you choose to experience through your individual consciousness.

Given that the superconscious mind consists of everything in the universe, it therefore consists of all individual consciousness.

In follows that you as well as every other individual, exist as an individual consciousness yet an integral part of the whole superconscious mind, with the right of free will to exercise choices to determine what you want out of the "Infinite Field Of Potentiality."

The right of free will is what differentiates your individual consciousness with that of the superconscious mind. Your ability to choose your thoughts, beliefs, emotions and actions gives you the unique power to shape your own life.

How do you make this choice? Through your individual consciousness!

More specifically, you make your choice through your conscious mind, while your subconscious mind acts on the direction from the conscious mind to establish connection with the super conscious mind, which then avail to you all its unlimited power of creation.

It is clear now that both minds have their own unique and crucial role in the process of creation. Both work together to establish the connection with the superconscious mind, which is the ultimate source of unlimited power.

The entire business of our life is to establish the connection with the super consciousness, where all richness and abundance flow.

The activities that have greatest impact on our life happen at the mind level! And this refers to the subconscious mind – which is responsible for making that connection.

This explains why most people are only using 10% of their mind’s capability – because most of their mind work operates at the conscious level. They have not been utilizing their subconscious mind, which accounts for 90% of the mind’s capability.
The great German physicist Nerst found that the longer an electric current was made to flow through a filament of oxide of magnesium, the greater became the conductivity of the filament.

In the same way, the more you call upon and use your subconscious mind, the greater becomes its conductivity in passing along to you the infinite resources of superconscious mind.

Think of this power as something that you can connect with any time. It has the answer to all of your problems. It can sets you free from fear, worry, sickness, and accident. Other than yourself, no man can ever deter you from the use of this power or rob you of any share of it.

Success does not happen by accident. It happens under the operation of the Law of Cause and Effect: Your mind, working through your brain and body, creates your world. As Don Carlos Musser said aptly in “You Are”:

"Because of the law of gravity the apple falls to the ground. Because of the law of growth the acorn becomes a mighty oak. Because of the law of causation, a man is ‘as he thinketh in his heart.’ Nothing can happen without its adequate cause."

As you will read in the Law of Vibration, everything, including thought or consciousness exists as a vibration frequency, which is broadcast into the Superconsciousness.

The superconscious mind makes no distinctions or judgments as to whether the energy is lower form or higher form, whether it is good or bad, whether it is supposed to manifest them. They simply act on whatever energy they receive, attract more of the like energy and commence its manifestation process.

Remember we have mentioned earlier that it is the subconscious mind that makes connection with the super conscious mind. The problem is that most of the time people desire something desperately in their conscious mind, yet in their subconscious mind they have intense emotion on things that they do not desire.

In another word, there is a disharmony between their conscious and subconscious mind.

Taking job for example, people wanted a secured job and hence a secured source of income. However, what they focus on is the fear of losing their job.

Fear become a very intense emotion that occupies the subconscious mind most of the time, and as a result get broadcasted to the super consciousness continuously to reinforce its manifestation.

The way around this problem will be to let go of the fearful emotion, and replace it with an unshakable sense of confidence that your career will make progress in the way you had desired and visualized. The more often you experience emotions of anxiety and fear, the higher the chance of manifesting those that you fear and anxious about.

This aspect of mind control is never easy. It takes practices and determination to make it works. However, with the right mind control tools and resources, the process of mastering this important skill set can become more efficient and effective. When you are able to master the control of your mind, you master the world in you. The reward of mind mastery would be bountiful and life changing.

The promise of the super consciousness (some call it the God) is beyond doubt, as Jesus said in the Bible:

"If ye abide in me, and my word abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you."

"For verily I say unto you, that whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he said shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith."

"The kingdom of God is within you."

For the skeptics, these are indisputable words of promises that one would only ignore at his own risk.

The writings are all over the wall. The power that abides in the super consciousness, or rather the God, is simply awesome and boundless. The beauty is, everybody has the divine heritage to this power and richness.

With the understanding that the conscious, subconscious, and the super conscious mind collectively form an integrated mind power system that is our divine birthright, you know very well now that the most important thing you can do for your life is to find the key to this unlimited source of happiness and prosperity!